对外经济贸易大学2003年法律硕士入学同等学力加试试卷
一。解释下列名词(可用中文或英文解释,并选作其中的五个,每个6分,共30分):
1.Acceptance 2. Agent 3. Stock 4. Defence 5. Evidence 6.Civil procedure
7.Partnership 8. Strict liability
二。将下列英文翻译成中文(共40分):
1.A contract cannot exist unless someone has made an offer to enter into a contract. An offer states what the offeror will do and what he expects in exchange. For an offer to be valid, the offeror must intend to make the offer and must communicate it to the offeree. Sol says to Barbara,I‘ll promise to sell you this model boat if you will promise to pay me $150.Sol, the offeror, has made an offer to Barbara, the offeree.
2.The New Deal reformers under President Franklin Roosevelt were determined to provide an honest marketplace for securities. By means of two statutes, the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Act of 1934, they permanently altered the way that publicly traded corporations had to treat the purchasers and holders of their securities .They also changed both the ethical and operational aspects of buying and selling securities.
三。阅读下面的起诉书并回答问题(请用中文回答,共30分):
Complaint 1.The plaintiff is a citizen of the State of Ohio.
2.The defendant Cardinal Skyhook Corp. is an Ohio corporation whose principal place of business is located in Franklin County.
3.The Defendant Donald H. (Driver) is a resident of Franklin County.
4.At all times relevant to this Complaint, Driver was employed by Cardinal Skyhook Corp. and was acting within scope of his employment.
5.On May 14, 1989, at approximately 9:30 a.m. ,Driver was operating a van belonging to Cardinal Skyhook Corp. in an easterly direction on Main Street in Columbus.
6.While proceeding at a speed in excess of the posted limit, Driver negligently caused the van to cross the center line and strike a 1988 Ford truck owned by the plaintiff which was lawfully parked on the north side of the street.
7.The truck, valued at $19,000, and its contents, 35 crates of widgets valued at $35,000, were a total loss.
Wherefore, the plaintiff demands judgment against Cardinal Skyhook Corp, or against Donald H. Driver, or against both of them in the sum of $54,000 and the costs of this action.
Buckeye Widgets Corp.
By Its Attorney
请回答下列问题:
1.原告为什么起诉Donald H. Driver?
2.原告起诉的理由和原因是什么?
3.原告的诉讼请求是什么?
【对外经济贸易大学2003年法律硕士入学同等学力加试试卷】相关文章:
★ 2014年东北师范大学学科教学(英语)考研复试试题(回忆版) 2
★ 2014年东北师范大学634教育学综合考研复试试题(回忆版) 2
★ 2014年湖南师范大学学科教学(思政)考研复试试题(回忆版)
★ 2014年东北师范大学行政管理学考研复试试题(回忆版) 2
★ 2014年陕西师范大学课程与教学论考研复试试题(回忆版)
- 2019-08-23【考研资料】 考研时必须要解决的五大问题
- 2019-08-07【考研资料】广东工业大学通信工程专业调剂经验分享
- 2019-05-29【考研资料】2018年湖北汽车工业学院硕士研究生入学考试自命题试题
- 2019-05-29【考研资料】2017年湖北汽车工业学院硕士研究生入学考试自命题试题
- 2019-05-29【考研资料】2016年湖北汽车工业学院硕士研究生入学考试自命题试题
- 2019-05-29【考研资料】2015年湖北汽车工业学院硕士研究生入学考试自命题试题
网友关注
- 【考研资料】杭州师范大学政治经济学院2013年复试细则
- 【考研资料】中国计量学院2013年硕士研究生复试须知
- 【考研资料】杭州师范大学2008年硕士生招生复试专业科目和参考书目
- 【考研资料】杭州师范大学杭州国际服务工程学院2013年复试细则
- 【考研资料】中国计量学院13年研究生复试综合面试视频管理办法
- 【考研资料】杭州师范大学材化学院2013年硕士研究生复试细则
- 【考研资料】杭州师范大学阿里巴巴商学院2013年复试细则
- 【考研资料】杭州师范大学健康管理学院2013年复试细则
精品推荐
- 2021考研管综逻辑300道推理题及答案(21)
- 2020考研管理类联考综合全国硕士研究生考试试题及答案(网友版)
- 2020考研管综逻辑演绎推理类型试题及答案解析(查字典考研网版)
- 2020考研管综逻辑分析推理类型试题及答案解析(查字典考研网版)
- 2020考研管综初等数学算术部分试题解析及往年对比
- 2020考研管综初数条件充分性判断部分试题答案及解析(查字典考研网版)
- 2020考研管理类联考初数问题求解部分试题答案及解析(查字典考研网版)
- 2020考研管综初等数学数据分析部分试题解析及往年对比
- 2020考研管综初等数学平面图形部分试题解析及往年对比
- 2020考研管综初等数学空间几何体部分试题解析及往年对比