2012年考研英语一真题:阅读真题下载(Text3)
2012年考研英语一真题。2012年考研英语考试已结束,考研教育网现将2012考研英语真题整理如下,供考生参考。
Text 3
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience. Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher‘s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works it through the community, the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual‘s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.
Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not re-search. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as “seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.” But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end, credibility “happens” to a discovery claim – a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. “We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other‘s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”
31. According to the first paragraph, the process of discovery is characterized by its
[A] uncertainty and complexity.
[B] misconception and deceptiveness.
[C] logicality and objectivity.
[D] systematicness and regularity.
32. It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 that credibility process requires
[A] strict inspection.
[B]shared efforts.
[C] individual wisdom.
[D]persistent innovation.
33.Paragraph 3 shows that a discovery claim becomes credible after it
[A] has attracted the attention of the general public.
[B]has been examined by the scientific community.
[C] has received recognition from editors and reviewers.
[D]has been frequently quoted by peer scientists.
34. Albert Szent-Gy?rgyi would most likely agree that
[A] scientific claims will survive challenges.
[B]discoveries today inspire future research.
[C] efforts to make discoveries are justified.
[D]scientific work calls for a critical mind.
35.Which of the following would be the best title of the test?
[A] Novelty as an Engine of Scientific Development.
[B]Collective Scrutiny in Scientific Discovery.
[C] Evolution of Credibility in Doing Science.
[D]Challenge to Credibility at the Gate to Science.
完型填空阅读理解(Text 1)阅读理解(Text 2)阅读理解(Text 3)
【2012年考研英语一真题:阅读真题下载(Text3)】相关文章:
★ 2014年考研英语二答案:阅读理解真题解析(Text 2)
★ 2014年考研英语一答案:阅读理解真题解析(Text 3)
★ 2014年考研英语一答案:阅读理解真题解析(Text 4)
★ 2014年考研英语二答案:阅读理解真题解析(Text 3)
★ 2014年考研英语一答案:阅读理解真题解析(Text 1)
- 2016-08-11【考研英语试题】2016年全国硕士研究生升学统一考试英语(一)真题
- 2016-08-03【考研英语试题】2016考研英语二:翻译与作文真题及答案详解
- 2016-08-03【考研英语试题】2016年考研英语二:阅读理解真题及其答案
- 2016-08-03【考研英语试题】2016年考研英语二真题:完形填空及其详细解析
- 2016-08-03【考研英语试题】2016年考研英语一真题:作文及其答案解析
- 2016-08-03【考研英语试题】2016年考研英语一真题:阅读理解及其答案解析
网友关注
- 【考研英语试题】2011年武汉纺织大学814设计史论考研试题
- 【考研英语试题】2011年武汉纺织大学627工业设计基础考研试题
- 【考研英语试题】2010年武汉纺织大学811思想政治教育原理考研试题
- 【考研英语试题】2011年武汉纺织大学823法学概论考研试题
- 【考研英语试题】2011年武汉纺织大学809中西方美学史考研试题
- 【考研英语试题】2002年中南财经政法大学法理学考研试题
- 【考研英语试题】2010年武汉纺织大学812机械设计考研试题
- 【考研英语试题】2000年中南财经政法大学刑法学考研试题
精品推荐
- 2021考研管综逻辑300道推理题及答案(21)
- 2020考研管理类联考综合全国硕士研究生考试试题及答案(网友版)
- 2020考研管综逻辑演绎推理类型试题及答案解析(查字典考研网版)
- 2020考研管综逻辑分析推理类型试题及答案解析(查字典考研网版)
- 2020考研管综初等数学算术部分试题解析及往年对比
- 2020考研管综初数条件充分性判断部分试题答案及解析(查字典考研网版)
- 2020考研管理类联考初数问题求解部分试题答案及解析(查字典考研网版)
- 2020考研管综初等数学数据分析部分试题解析及往年对比
- 2020考研管综初等数学平面图形部分试题解析及往年对比
- 2020考研管综初等数学空间几何体部分试题解析及往年对比